Showing posts with label cinema. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cinema. Show all posts

Reel Brief: Up in the Air, or the genius of Jason Reitman

Presenting the latest installment of Reel Brief: Up in the Air, or as you'll soon see, the genius of Jason Reitman. (Pardon the clichés—they totally do not reflect what I thought of the film. This film is anything but clichéd.)
Up in the Air – A-
Up in the Air is the latest dark comedy/drama from Canadian auteur Jason Reitman (Juno, Thank You for Smoking), and it certainly displays his maturity while retaining his creative and innovative style definitive of his earlier efforts. The film, adapted from Walter Kirn's novel, follows Ryan Bingham (George Clooney), a man who jets around the country attempting to alleviate the stress and devastation of newly fired employees. In other words, he fires people whose bosses are too afraid to do it themselves. He boasts about how he spends most of the year gallivanting through the skies and leading a life of continuous solitude.

The tide in Ryan's life begins to turn when he meets Alex (Vera Farmiga), a fellow frequent flyer, and develops a casual relationship with her. Around the same time, his boss (Jason Bateman) decides that Ryan should mentor an ambitious newcomer to the firm, Natalie Keener (Anna Kendrick). Fresh out of Cornell, Natalie naively follows Ryan around the country and quickly discovers the secrets of the trade. These two relationships gradually change Ryan's outlook on life and force him to question the purpose of his transient lifestyle.
Clooney, as he did in 2007's Michael Clayton, presents an effortlessly suave and charming persona harboring a delusional conscience. From the outset, Ryan Bingham is Clooney at his best—smooth but complex, sophisticated but capricious. Clooney's charm and wit always seems to harken back to a star of yore—Cary Grant—and this performance only solidifies this notion. Farmiga complements Clooney, providing both a parallel and a contrast to Clooney's character. But the true scene-stealer is the talented Kendrick, who has the film's most snarky and sarcastic lines. She provides much of the comic relief, and yet she plays the film's most honest and fully fleshed character. Kendrick's genuine grace separates Natalie from the typical "young protégé" archetype.
The magnificent star turns from Clooney, Farmiga, and Kendrick carry the film, but the real star of the show is Reitman. His ingenious direction guides the film onto so many unexpected avenues and puts a spin on the predictability of most "white-collar" films. By using real Midwestern employees in the firing scenes, he enhances the emotional effect of the film while sharpening its accuracy and relevance. Although the film's cynical tone and pessimistic themes represent a departure from the lighter fare of Reitman's past, its biting, acerbic wit, embedded in almost every scene, insures that the film is not a complete antithesis to his previous two films. Reitman, in collaboration with Sheldon Turner, also penned the screenplay, laced with smart humor and memorable lines, all while emphasizing dynamic character interactions. These days, it's rare to find a film with three multi-dimensional characters, especially given that two are female. Reitman avoids the hackneyed male-centric approach, opting to incorporate Alex and Natalie into Ryan's narrative as much as possible.
Elsewhere, Reitman maintains a slick, momentous feel to the film. Every shot feels perfectly placed, every frame feels just right. At times, the film's meticulous visual flair, especially Dana Glauberman's superb editing, is almost too comforting. 
Up in the Air is bound to strike a chord with its audiences for its star power, delicate balance of comedy and drama, and pertinence amid today's economic climate. Critics have hailed it "a film for our times" due to its timely themes. It questions the definition of success and puts a face to the nomadic existence with which this generation increasingly identifies and consciously adopts. "The slower we move, the faster we die", Ryan asserts. We are a generation constantly on the move, but how fast can we keep moving before we lose all semblance of ourselves?

More musings...

Lost in Translation



This movie has always been very near and dear to my heart. I think of it often, especially when traveling to a new place or when I feel lonely. It poignantly captures the increasing isolation of our flattening world and how vital human contact really is. Personally, it makes me wish I was more connected to my surroundings. And I love how the sprawl of Tokyo is, in essence, an integral character in the film. That aspect makes me I wish I could travel more often and become a more worldly person. Maybe that's why I'm always so fascinated by people who have actually been places, experienced life, and have something to say about it, like my English teacher, whose first teaching job was teaching English in Japan. And of course, Japan always reminds me of Lost in Translation. Everything comes full circle these days... It's like all tangents somehow lead to the same endpoint.
I feel a certain, ineffable emptiness in my life. Part of it is that I miss having time to watch movies. I want to rewatch Lost in Translation sometime soon. I haven't seen it in basically forever, and I reaaaallly adore it. 


 
*sigh* My brain is so void of ideas these days, a combination of school fatigue and dissatisfaction with my life right now.
More musings...

The Talented Ms. Collette

One of my favorite contemporary thespians, Australian actress Toni Collette, turns 37 today. Over the last decade and a half, she has defined herself as the quintessential character actor, taking on roles both big and small, headlining both the mainstream and the obscure. She's never afraid to branch out, trying her hand in indie comedies, costume dramas, chick-flicks—you name it, she's done it. And if that wasn't enough, she recently won an Emmy for her current project, Showtime's United States of Tara, in which she plays Tara, a woman with multiple personality disorder. In essence, she plays four reincarnations of the same character. Quite the challenge for most, but not for this chameleon-like leading lady. I don't have Showtime, so I haven't seen any of the episodes. It must be pretty exceptional work because 1) It's Toni Collette, and 2) She beat out the clear favorite, Tina Fey (30 Rock), for her Emmy win.
Happy Birthday to Toni, and to all of you, please check out some of her eclectic filmography, including her hilarious breakout Muriel's Wedding (1994), her haunting portrayal of a tormented mother in The Sixth Sense (1999), crazy, manic-depressive in About a Boy (2002), career woman always having to tend to her sister's needs or bail her out in In Her Shoes (2005), and matriarch of a terribly dysfunctional family in Little Miss Sunshine (2006).
More musings...

"The slower we move, the faster we die. Make no mistake: Moving is living."

from the trailer of Up in the Air, the new film from director Jason Reitman (Juno) opening in limited release on November 13 and widening over the Thanksgiving holiday. It's a dark comedy about a life constantly on the move. George Clooney plays Ryan Bingham, a "corporate downsizing expert" who travels around the country firing people. The film explores a phenomenon that is far from an anomaly in today's fast-moving world, the idea that we are all loners and can't build relationships because we never have the time to stop for a second and make the effort.
Up in the Air is getting rave reviews on the festival circuit this year, particularly for Clooney, newcomer Anna Kendrick, and Reitman's screenplay adapted from Walter Kirn's novel. Look for it as a formidable contender in the upcoming awards derby. I, for one, am extremely satisfied with the trailer, which Reitman himself cut. It looks like a very pertinent and introspective film for our times. Reitman has said that it is his most personal film yet, and it definitely has a darker tone than Juno or Thank You For Smoking.
WATCH THE TRAILER. IT'S BRILLIANT.


More musings...

Caption This: On the Set of Inception

I was browsing some movie blogs the other day when I discovered a gallery of photos from the set of Inception, the new film from The Dark Knight director Chris Nolan, currently shooting in Paris. I briefly mentioned my anticipation for the film back in April, when it was announced. I'm looking forward to it for a multitude of reasons, but mainly b/c Nolan has become one of my favorite working directors. He likes to incorporate a lot of darkly complex themes into each of his pictures, making them truly films for the "thinking man". At the same time, they certainly appeal to mainstream audiences. Contrary to popular belief, Inception is not Batman 3; that installment is not expected until at least 2011.

More musings...

Reel Brief: Julie & Julia

Julie & Julia - B+
Writer-director Nora Ephron, creator of crowd-friendly '90s rom-coms Sleepless in Seattle and You've Got Mail, as well as that clunker of a movie Bewitched, returns with a different kind of tale than her usual subjects. Julie & Julia focuses on the stories of two women, NYC cubicle worker turned blogger Julie Powell (Amy Adams) and iconic chef Julia Child (Meryl Streep). From the very beginning, Ephron's smart script, based on both Powell's book of the same name and Child's memoir, intertwines the tales and establishes clear parallels between them. Powell, undermined by her far more successful friends, decides to create a blog chronicling her quest to cook all 524 recipes of Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking in one year. ("I could write a blog. I have thoughts.") What follows is a humorous journey through boeuf bourginon, lobsters, and a lot of Bon Appétit!. Powell begins to feel a strong connection to her readers and to Child, but she sometimes gets carried away. Unfortunately, this part of the story employs a lot of the usual relationship clichés: Powell's husband Eric (Chris Messina) gets slightly fed up with her frequent meltdowns and self-absorbed behavior, and drama ensues.
Alongside the Julie story is, naturally, the Julia story, which details Child's life before she became the Julia Child. While her husband Paul (Stanley Tucci) works in Paris as a diplomat, Child resorts to cooking as a means of occupying her time. After some trials while studying at the renowned culinary institute Le Cordon Bleu, she fully hones in on her passion when, along with two collaborators, she begins to write what would become Mastering the Art of French Cooking. Both stories highlight the struggles and modest ridicule each woman faces in accomplishing her goals, as well their generally supportive husbands who seem too good to be true.
Adams generally holds up her side well, painting a picture of an ordinary thirty-something searching for meaning in her lowly life. In that respect, the audience can easily relate to her. The always fabulous Tucci has some memorable lines in his brief appearances. But, something seems inherently missing when the vivacious Streep is not onscreen. Her charming portrayal succinctly captures the contagious joie de vivre Child was so famous for. The role inevitably features the traditional "Streepisms", but Streep certainly manages to inject a sense of novelty in it.
Julie & Julia is perhaps best suited for film gourmands. Despite the obvious and predictable flaws, this generic comedy does contain hilarious moments and, if it engages you enough, a few gourmet gifts.

An aside: here's the trailer for The Lovely Bones. The Apple.com version includes an introduction by PJ himself. It looks very intriguing; my excitement is mounting.

I'm leaving for the West Coast before the crack of dawn tomorrow (*groan*), so goodbye blogosphere!
More musings...

"The concept is absurd. The idea that we can only be complete with another person is evil! Right?"

This post is brought to you by the latest trend on Facebook: MarriageBot, which basically predicts your possible future spouses and ranks them. Wow. And, it's not even one of those insanely dumb quizzes. It just randomly gives you a list of people based on things you've done on Facebook. I do not wish to try it b/c it seems like just another one of those ridiculous, trivial applications that define the almighty Facebook.
It's strange that a dumb Facebook application somehow relates to two films I watched recently. I finally got around to seeing Before Sunrise and its sequel Before Sunset (the origin of this post's ridiculously long title). I won't mention too much about the plot; it's not what this post is about. The first film deals with two strangers in Vienna, an American guy, Jesse (Ethan Hawke), and a French girl, Céline (Julie Delpy). They spend one enchanted night wandering around the city, talking about not only themselves, but their philosophical beliefs and opinions on a variety of topics. Both are rather cynical about the idea of romance, true love and its possibilities. But, they realize they share a connection but have such a limited amount of time together since Jesse has a plane to catch in the morning. The sequel picks up the story nine years later, where the two meet by chance in Paris. Things have inevitably changed over the years. An unhappily married Jesse has written a novel based on that night in Vienna, and Paris is the last stop on his book tour. Céline lives in Paris and works as an environmental activist while going in and out of unsuccessful relationships. However, the cynical mindsets still remain, and they are eager to reconnect.
One of the overall themes in both films is the idea that perhaps brief encounters are better than prolonged relationships. Maybe people inevitably grow dissatisfied and sick of each other; the only reason people stay together is b/c they are expected to do so. And yet, a lot of people these days focus their lives on finding their one true love, using all kinds of tactics like eHarmony and all those online dating services. (Let's hope people don't have to start taking MarriageBot seriously!) Some idiots even secretly fly to Argentina and make up a story about hiking on the Appalachian Trail. What they don't realize is that the idea of that one person you're destined to be with could be just a load of b.s. Society tends to idealize this concept.
I know I, too, am a cynic when it comes to romance, but I'm not saying that long term commitment is impossible. I'm just trying to point out that people take great strides just to find someone that will probably disappoint them eventually. They can't always be happy together.
To take a more optimistic side, I guess people shouldn't try so hard to find love and let it come to them instead. It might take them by surprise: They might find a connection simply by chance. One thing is for sure: There are few people in the world that you'll find a true connection with, so don't let them pass you by like in the case of Jesse and Céline.
In the meantime, I highly recommend Before Sunrise and Before Sunset. Although both are largely conversational, particularly the latter, they will definitely give you something to ponder afterward and will linger in your mind for a while. These are two refreshing flicks that abandon the usual gimmicks romance films constantly employ. Instead of idealizing romance, Before Sunrise and Before Sunset provide characters that are real people with real problems. The luminous Delpy and charming Hawke share undeniable chemistry, and the witty dialogue and truthful themes make everything both lively and meaningful. In general, I think they are two lovely little flicks. On the other hand, my pondering seems more appropriate for a conversation over coffee in a café on a cold day rather than on a humid August afternoon. Oh well.
Before Sunset
More musings...

Queen's Day

If you despise Meryl Streep, I greatly apologize for today's lengthy post. But, how could you? :)
Nathaniel over at The Film Experience has informally proclaimed June as Meryl Streep Month, and today, the celebrations culminate as the legendary Ms. Streep turns 60. Amid his "Streep at 60: A Retrospective" series and his blog buddy Nick's tribute piece, I've decided to offer my own rather elementary take and appreciation of sorts to one of the classiest and down to earth ladies in Hollywood and, first and foremost, one of our greatest silver screen giants. (I say elementary because between those two sources, you've already got enough Streep praise for a day!)

In a career spanning 30+ years, Meryl has graced character after character, ranging from her tragic Sophie Zawistowski, a Holocaust survivor haunted by the secrets of her past, to her icy Miranda Priestly, the omnipotent editor-in-chief of Runway magazine. Her never-ending list of accolades impresses even the most experienced moviegoers: 15 Oscar nominations and (only) 2 wins, 23 Golden Globe nods and 6 wins, 2 Emmys, Lifetime Achievement Awards from the American Film Institute and the Film Society of Lincoln Center, and many more. Will anyone ever topple her records? I think not, but it's still debatable. (Fangirl moment: Can AMPAS hurry up and give her a third/fourth Oscar? You know she deserves it.)
But, enough about that. I know if she were reading this post (psh, I can wish), she probably wouldn't relish each reference to her gargantuan circle of awards. She wouldn't want to hear about how fantastic her performances are and how impressive her career is, but I can't help that. Every performance is meticulously crafted, technical, sometimes even polarizing. But even so, her best roles are often deeply affecting, transformative, and endearing. Regardless of the style or genre, her character creations are always a sight to behold. Although Meryl loves to think otherwise, she is the queen of characters, accents, and arguably of modern cinema. Watching any of her performances is watching a grand master in her state of Zen. There are not nearly enough words to describe them.
They call her the chameleon for a reason: Her versatility is beyond measure. Similarly, her humility is beyond inspiring. Despite her storied career, she never takes herself too seriously and always seems to have a refreshing sense of humor about everything. She doesn't forget her humble beginnings growing up in New Jersey, attending Vassar and Dartmouth College, and getting an MFA from Yale's prestigious School of Drama. Her dedication to her craft and the longevity of her career are what other actors can only dream of. And, she's successfully raised four talented children and stayed married to the same man her entire career. In today's Hollywood, that seems like a myth. At the end of the day, maybe that's why she's so extraordinary- there's no one quite like Meryl.
Below, in collage form, is a breakdown of some of her most iconic and memorable roles, what can be perceived as 10 Streep essentials. Keep in mind that I still have a lot to see, so this is just a sampling. I won't bore you with the details of each one, but you can read more about them at The Film Experience (Nathaniel is painstakingly reviewing the highlights) . In addition, here are 60 ways to celebrate.

10 Streep Essentials: 1. Kramer vs. Kramer (1979); 2. Sophie's Choice (1982); 3. Silkwood (1983); 4. Out of Africa (1985); 5. Postcards from the Edge (1990); 6. One True Thing (1998); 7. The Hours (2002); 8. Adaptation. (2002); 9. Angels in America (2003); 10. The Devil Wears Prada (2006)
In the meantime, the queen of modern cinema never stops! In August, she will be seen in Nora Ephron's Julie & Julia, where she takes on the late chef Julia Child. It's her third summer movie in three years, making it hard to believe that she's gaining the most commercial appeal of her career at an age when most actresses are long gone from the mainstream. Later this year, she stars in an as of yet untitled Nancy Meyers comedy.
In closing, Meryl's contemporaries and descendants constantly thank and honor her. But today, we get to sing her praises too. I can honestly say that we are so lucky to live in the Streep era of cinema and to experience every moment of her screen life. HAPPY BIRTHDAY to the ultimate chameleon, goddess, living legend, and idol: the one and only Meryl Streep.
P.S.: She's hilarious! Her acceptance speeches are always a treat, and her interviews are never dull. Here's one with Ellen DeGeneres. Trust me, you will be dying laughing when you get to the dialects part (6:00).
That's all. (a Meryl cliché for those of you who love The Devil Wears Prada like I do!)
More musings...

Reel Brief: Coming Attractions 2009 (2)

Previously: Part 1
Shutter Island (Paramount)- 10/02
Shutter Island is the third Dennis Lehane novel to be adapted for the screen, this time by Laela Kalogridis. It follows an eerie plot involving two US marshals (Leonardo DiCaprio & Mark Ruffalo) investigating the escape of Rachel Solando (Emily Mortimer), a patient at Ashecliffe, an insane asylum on Shutter Island in remote Massachusetts.
<= The film seems to be advertised as a film noir-esque thriller, not the typical genre for the cast and director Martin Scorsese. Scorsese, who finally won his long overdue Best Director Oscar for 2006's The Departed, can once again showcase his mad cinematic skills, a welcome return for every moviegoer. I'm also looking forward to the vibrant cast, particularly the constantly underrated Ruffalo & Mortimer in their juicy roles.
Up (Disney/Pixar)- 5/29 [trailer]
Evidently, Pixar has a venerable track record of creating animated hits that always please: Toy Story, A Bug's Life, WALL•E, and my personal fave, Finding Nemo. Additionally, their films have won the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature 4 times since the category was created in 2001. Now, the innovative studio has another family-friendly movie perfect for the summer. Up tells the story of 78 year old Carl Fredrickson, who finally realizes his dream of seeing the world by attaching thousands of balloons to his house and literally floating away. His plans take a turn when he finds 8 year old Russell hidden in his house. I've long grown out of kiddie movies, but Pixar's features appeal to all ages and are always worth their while.
Away We Go (Focus Features)- 6/05 [trailer]
From a screenplay written by bestselling authors Dave Eggers and Vendela Vida, this dramedy is about a couple (John Krasinski & Maya Rudolph) searching for the right place to settle down and raise their soon-to-be-born child. Sam Mendes adds to his unique filmography of suburban dissection (American Beauty & Revolutionary Road), mobsters (Road to Perdition), and wars (Jarhead) by shifting gears with what looks like a witty and heartwarming flick. And, our favorite Dunder Mifflin Scranton assistant regional manager Krasinski and versatile SNL alum Rudolph could potentially jump-start their fledgling movie careers with their first leading roles.
Taking Woodstock (Focus Features)- 8/14 [trailer]
The films of Ang Lee show a vast range of eccentricities, so it's no surprise that the Brokeback Mountain director has now chosen to tackle the subject of the Woodstock Festival, the arts and music gathering that remains one of the symbols of tumultuous 1960s Americana. The film follows Elliot Tiber (Demetri Martin), one of Woodstock's key organizers. Based on a true story, Lee regular James Schamus adapted the film from Tiber's autobiography of the same name. Martin is an interesting casting choice, seeing as that he is a comedian best known for his work as Senior Youth Correspondent on The Daily Show. He is joined by an impressive supporting cast that includes Imelda Staunton as his mother and Emile Hirsch as a soldier recently returned from Vietnam. A whole host of other actors play addtional characters who shaped Tiber and the Woodstock landscape.
An Education (Sony Pictures Classics)- Oct.
British newcomer Carey Mulligan stars in this coming-of-age indie about a naïve Londoner swept off her feet by a charming playboy (Peter Sarsgaard). The flick, directed by Danish director Lone Scherfig and written by novelist Nick Hornby (About a Boy, High Fidelity), won the Audience Award at this year's Sundance Film Festival and has been riding on a lot of buzz ever since. If the buzz can last until December, look for it on the grueling awards circuit. In particular, Mulligan has received praise for her performance, and crazy Oscar pundits are already predicting a lot of traction for her in the Best Actress race.
More musings...

Reel Brief: Coming Attractions 2009 (1)

INT. THEATRE
A GIRL settles into her seat, popcorn in hand, waiting intently for the feature presentation to begin. She glances under her feet and finds gum sticking to her shoe. Slightly bothered, the girl sighs and focuses straight ahead. The lights dim, chatter diminishes, and the screen flickers.
I decided to do my most anticipated movies series differently from the way I did it last year. I picked ten films in no particular order and wrote a little blurb about each summarizing why you should look out for it. Short and sweet. And since variety is the spice of life, I've selected movies of a variety of genres and styles. Note that this is just a sampling; these are difficult to narrow down, and I always discover a few flicks later in the year, especially if they're indies. The first five after the jump.
More musings...
*Release dates subject to change
The Boat that Rocked (Universal)- 8/28 [trailer]
A new comedy from writer-director Richard Curtis (Love Actually, Four Weddings & A Funeral), The Boat that Rocked is about a group of 1960s radio DJs, led by loudmouthed American "The Count" (Philip Seymour Hoffman in a comedic role!). The crew operates pirate broadcasts to the UK from a ship off the coast. (Historical perspective: the British government limited the amount of radio stations, so many stations would try offshore pirate broadcasting to gain an audience.) Unfortunately, this hasn't received very good reception across the pond. Critics have panned the film for a "muddled" organization and "contrived storyline." This could mean equally disappointing reviews when it premieres here. We shall see...
The Lovely Bones (DreamWorks/Paramount)- 12/11
Peter Jackson, Philippa Boyens, and Fran Walsh, the team behind the spectacular film version of The Lord of the Rings trilogy, adapted Alice Sebold's bestselling novel about Susie Salmon (Saoirse Ronan), who is raped and murdered by a neighbor, George Harvey (Stanley Tucci). From Heaven, Susie watches her family cope with their loss and analyzes the choices they must make. Any literary adaptation will be strictly compared to its source material, but this team has proven itself with LOTR. They've also assembled a talented cast: besides Ronan and Tucci, Rachel Weisz and Mark Wahlberg play Susie's parents, and Susan Sarandon plays her grandmother. Additionally, the film is sure to bring up many provocative themes.
This Side of the Truth (Warner Bros.)- 9/25
The always hilarious Ricky Gervais makes his directorial debut in this flick about "a world where no one has ever lied, until a writer seizes the opportunity for personal gain." This Side of the Truth features an all-star cast of some of today's big names in comedy, including Gervais himself, Jason Bateman, Jonah Hill, Tina Fey, and SNL's featured player Bobby Moynihan. Together, its interesting premise and lineup of comics could make it one of the year's more exceptional comedies. Originally scheduled for a spring release, the film's details are still being kept under wraps until the fall. In the meantime, watch Ricky's announcement of the release date, which features some advice to the little kiddies. :)
Julie & Julia (Columbia)- 8/07 (Isn't the teaser poster cute?) =>
Here's one for the gourmands! Nora Ephron based this flick on NYC blogger Julie Powell's best-selling book Julie & Julia: 365 Days, 524 Recipes, 1 Tiny Apartment Kitchen and French chef Julia Child's memoir My Life in France. The former originates from Powell's blog chronicling her quest to complete each recipe in Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking. Ephron has recruited two lovely ladies to portray the leading roles, Amy Adams as Julie Powell and Meryl Streep as Julia Child. So, I guess this is also one for the ladies!
Nine (The Weinstein Company)- 11/25
The award-winning Broadway musical now has an screen version, thanks to director Rob Marshall (Chicago). Yours truly isn't the biggest fan of musicals and over-hyped Oscar bait, but the plot and cast could change her opinion of this particular film. Daniel Day-Lewis is Guido Contini, a director facing a midlife crisis. He must balance his relationships with his wife (Marion Cotillard), mistress (Penélope Cruz), mother (Sophia Loren), producer (Judi Dench), and protégée (Nicole Kidman). Complicated indeed. We know Kidman can handle the vocal demands (Moulin Rouge!), but it remains to be seen if the rest of these thespians have the skills to take on Nine's showy tunes.
*The other five coming soon!
More musings...

Hollywood's Annual Night of Cinematic Mercy (2)

First off, I promise this is the last cinema-related post in a long time. I just realized this is the third one in a row, and I haven't substantially written about anything else in a while. But, I would like to reflect on the film year with my pondering.

Overall, I feel the Oscars capped off the year in a spirited way, particularly after this rather long-winded season. However, I'm relieved it's finally over. As a casual observer, I don't enjoy the drama of each awards cycle, and every year, I come to the same conclusion: I wouldn't want to cover it for a living.
Year after year, I am irritated by the ever-growing anomaly that it's not about appreciating the films; it all comes down to the zeitgeist. This year, seemingly every awards body gravitated towards the same 4-5 movies, and by no means were they the only noteworthy ones. I personally did enjoy two of them (Slumdog & Milk), but the rest felt so worn down as the season dragged on. I always fear that the other films not receiving the same influx of attention will be forgotten. They don't deserve the shaft, especially those small flicks that needed awards attention to gain viewers. In turn, specific elements of the films lacking buzz also fall victim to being overlooked. But in attempting to be more positive, I constantly remind myself that often, great films/performances/writing/everything are their own gift to us.
Still, I must bring up this quote from 2-time Oscar winner Jodie Foster. It's probably from years ago, but I remember it every year b/c she accurately sums up what the process has become.

"Winning the Oscar is no measure of performance. It's just bingo. You get five names that are thrown in a hat. One name is going to get pulled out and somebody goes, 'bingo!' You just wish it was your name. I mean, yes, the competition is unfair, and when you get to a certain point, and you're trying to choose between five different performances in five different genres that have absolutely nothing to do with each other, it's totally academic who wins. So of course you pick the people for all sorts of really stupid reasons. 'Well, this one's too old.' Or, 'This one is old, so let's give it to him.' Or 'This person hasn't had a good part for years. The nomination is the award'. Once you've had the performance, and you've had the nomination, I can't imagine taking it personally that you weren't the name pulled out of that hat."
That's the sad part: it's more about luck than anything else. There are so many outside factors.
Also, the Academy will never change their ways either; they nominate the same types of movies, ones that fit their predated mold and have the most buzz, biggest campaigns, etc. They lament about their tumbling ratings, and yet they nominate the most predictable films. Memo to AMPAS: if you want better ratings, why not go against the grain? Actually do your job and take the time to watch the screeners instead of just going by word of mouth. Then, we might not end up with the same lineups as every precursor. Maybe step outside the box and seize the opportunity to nominate a spectacular film that achieves the rare feat of appealing to both mass audiences and critics or an innovative, animated wonder for Best Picture even if you already have a category for it. Then, people might watch b/c not every award will seem like a foregone conclusion.
I'm not saying there are solid solutions to "save" awards season b/c there probably aren't any. Evidently, changing the show doesn't help either. The early word on this year's Oscars ceremony shows a 13% increase from last year's viewership but still places it among the three lowest watched telecasts (last year and 2003). And, the Academy certainly should not start nominating more popcorn blockbusters (except for the occasional Dark Knights), which would completely obliterate their credibility.
Perhaps the worst news of all: in about eight months, this crazy cycle starts all over again. So clearly, life goes on, and awards season is not always worth the preoccupation people have with it. We can praise and criticise all we want, but eventually, the excitement dies down and leads to the next big "thing". As the rhetoric subsides, my greatest wish is lest we forget, art is always about individuality, no matter how much or how little it is acknowledged.
*See below (part 1) for thoughts on the actual show; once again, I deeply apologize for the length. It must have been painful to read. :(
More musings...

Hollywood's Annual Night of Cinematic Mercy (1)

So, now that awards season has finally commenced with the grand soirée of them all, the Academy Awards, I want to reflect on yet another convoluted whirlwind this awards cycle. But before that, my thoughts on the changes/caveats/everything else about this year's ceremony, "the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly", after the jump. Once again, I embedded a few YouTube clips for your convenience. :)
More musings...
The Good:
-Hugh Jackman actually turned out to be a fine host. I had slight qualms about the Oscars steering away from the comedian emcee thing they have long established as a trademark. Hugh's song and dance background ideally fits the mold of the Grammys or the Tonys more so than the Oscars, but I was wrong this time around. His "recession-proof" opening number was a lot of fun to watch and contained great jokes ridiculing the inevitable problem of how much of the general public has no interest in the nominated films. And, of course, he was uber-charming. :)
-New presenter format for acting awards: If you've watched the show before, you're probably aware of the tradition they have of bringing back the 4 winners from the previous year and have them present the award of the opposite sex (i.e. last year's Best Actor present Best Actress) in kind of a "passing of the torch". This year, many awards watchers panicked when Oscar producers Bill Condon and Laurence Mark mentioned they were abandoning this tradition. However, I was pleasantly surprised and impressed by the new "passing of the torch" approach. For each acting award, they brought back 5 past winners to introduce each of the 5 nominees, and one of them was designated to open the envelope. Very cool and a method that truly never crossed my mind until yesterday.
Here's a sample (Best Actress):

-Queen Latifah singing during In Memoriam: Again, a lot of awards watchers were initially confused by this new addition. Usually, they just play some nostalgic-sounding classical music, sometimes played live by a famous classical musician (always nice and perfectly appropriate), but this year, the talented Queen Latifah sang a lovely song to accompany the montage of the people the film industry lost this year. It was a interesting change, but it worked it pretty well. Of course, the reel culminated with one last tribute to the legendary Paul Newman.
The Bad:
-the Original Song conglomeration: Shows how much the Academy cares about this category. First, b/c of their uber-puzzling preferential ballot system in this category, they only nominated three instead of the usual five songs. Then, they give each song a mere 60-65 seconds of performance time in a mash-up of sorts. Come on.
-no film/acting nominee clips: I like these b/c they give people an idea of what the nominee did to deserve (or in some case, didn't deserve) their nomination. Normally, they omit these if they have time constraints, and obviously they did with this year's new presenter format, which took up the time normally allotted for the clips. So, they actually had a good reason to omit these, unlike years past, where they've sometimes just eliminated that portion for seemingly no reason.
The Ugly:
-Montages: Like every show, I was hoping there would be less of them this year, but there were actually more. But instead of them being random featurettes of different aspects of filmmaking or whatever else they like to use in montages, each montage was a "Yearbook" of the year in Romance, Action, Comedy (featuring a clever short film from Judd Apatow, Seth Rogen, and James Franco), and Animation. While it's nice that they're using this to mention the films they don't nominate, I must object when they put, for lack of a better term, crappy movies in a montage with good movies. For instance, the Romance montage featured moments from the likes of Milk, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, and Revolutionary Road combined with those from Mamma Mia!, High School Musical 3, and Twilight. Wrong choice. The latter group, no matter how popular they are, DO NOT BELONG AT THE ACADEMY AWARDS IN A MONTAGE WITH OTHER GOOD FLICKS.
-a vast majority of the presenters: They didn't belong there (btw: Huffington Post has a poll about this topic). They didn't deserve to be there. Especially sitting in the same room and breathing the same air amongst living legends like Meryl Streep, Sir Anthony Hopkins, Robert DeNiro, etc. Robert Pattinson? Zac Efron? Sarah Jessica Parker? The list goes on. I mean, every year, they get a few odd presenters that seem out of place (last year, Miley Cyrus owned this category), but this year, I felt like it was nearly everyone. Was the rest of the world unavailable? Geez. Interestingly enough, I thought I was the most peeved about this (I always complain about undeserving presenters), but my co-editor was practically shouting when we were discussing this in our conversation today. He said, and I quote, that "it was like they just picked up some random hobos off the streets of L.A. and had them present. Every time, I was shouting at the TV, 'Get off the freaking stage!'" And, I hate to admit it, but he's right. I absolutely concur; it just didn't feel like the Oscars with those talentless idiots handing out all the awards. And, another observation: many of them presented multiple awards in a row. Seriously AMPAS, was no one else available???
-Red Carpet, as usual: You've probably figured out by now that I'm pretty apathetic towards these, and while I did jot down some things during E!'s always horrendous Red Carpet (only they can get away with using the phrase "glamastrator"), there's really not much you missed.

Big 8 Awards Summary
(I accurately predicted all of them, but it's nothing to brag about since this year was so pre-determined by the precursors/zeitgeist):
•Supp. Actress- presented by Tilda Swinton (2007), Whoopi Goldberg (1990), Anjelica Huston (1985), Goldie Hawn (1969), & Eva Marie Saint (1954)
Winner: Penélope Cruz (Vicky Cristina Barcelona)- A lot of Oscar pundits suddenly began predicting Viola Davis (my personal fave of the nominees) last week, but I played it safe and stuck with Penélope. I just couldn't see why the Academy, of all people, would change it up.
Great speech to start out the night! I especially appreciated the part about "protecting art", which never gets old around these parts. And just like her fellow Spaniard Javier Bardem last year, she ended with a little bit to her Spanish fans and family.
•Original Screenplay- presented by the hilariously awesome Tina Fey and Steve Martin (one of the only good presenter pairs)
I'm glad they brought back the feature of reading a few lines from each screenplay while playing that particular scene. It provides a brief glimpse into the arguably most important part of filmmaking, the blank page.
Winner: Dustin Lance Black (Milk)- WALL•E had a pretty good shot here, but in the end, I think the Academy preferred the perpetually rousing speeches to the perfectly measured silence.
Another powerful, but political speech (starts at about 3:54) which I know people thought might have been too deep, but you have to understand how personal Milk was to this guy. He's openly gay, and after hearing Harvey Milk's story, he was determined to write the film and pitch it to studios even though it was deemed a huge risk by others. Bravo!
•Adapted Screenplay- presenters: ditto.
Winner: Simon Beaufoy (Slumdog Millionaire)
This was a given, so not much to say here; the 1st of 8 Oscars for Slumdog last night, at least according to the mental tally I kept.
•Supp. Actor- presented by Alan Arkin (2006), Cuba Gooding Jr. (1996), Kevin Kline (1988), Christopher Walken (1978), & Joel Grey (1972)
Winner: Heath Ledger (The Dark Knight)- There was no way they weren't going to give it to him, especially after his tragic death, winning pretty much every award on the face of the Earth for this role, and his family flying all the way out from Australia to accept it on his behalf. Say what you will about the excessive hype, but Heath deserved it. That said, I feel bad for the other Supp. Actor nominees, who were great too but had no shot at all.
Anyway, God bless his family for staying strong and delivering one of the most heartfelt moments of the evening.
•Director- presented by Reese Witherspoon
Winner: Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire)- No room for surprises here.
Even though I'm not the biggest fan of Slumdog, I give major props to Danny Boyle for having the guts to take a camera straight through the streets of Mumbai and shoot the film without big stars or hefty studios. Here's to a job well done, maestro.
•Actress- presented by Marion Cotillard (2007), Nicole Kidman (2002), Halle Berry (2001), Shirley Maclaine (1983), & Sophia Loren (1961)
You guys know about my affinity for the amazing Kate and my irking feeling of her winning for the wrong role this year (well actually the wrong year too. IMO, she should have won 4 years ago for Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.) I've gradually come to terms with it, and it all came full circle last night during Marion Cotillard's moving tribute during the nominees presentation (0:58 on the aforementioned video). I was once more reminded of why I love this actress and her truly sublime work over the years, and at that moment, I realized, this girl deserves it for everything. She deserves it, and I will be happy. And I am, b/c it's about time.
Winner: Kate Winslet (The Reader)- Some prognosticators were sticking to their guns and predicting Meryl. Others sensed a potential vote split and made their last minute prediction to indie darling and "actor's actor" Melissa Leo. They were possible outcomes, but ultimately, it's the year of the Kate.
"Academy Award Winner Kate Winslet" has quite the ring to it! Her speech is at 5:10 on the video, so I don't need to discuss it. More contained and less teary than her second Globes speech.
•Actor- presented by Adrien Brody (2002), Sir Anthony Hopkins (1991), Michael Douglas (1987), Sir Ben Kingsley (1982), & Robert DeNiro (1980)
I really enjoyed Best Actor this year because, aside from Brad Pitt's excruciatingly mediocre turn in ...Benjamin Button, we were treated a phenomenal crop of nominees this year. Yes, I was bitter over one equally fabulous contender (*cough* Leo DiCaprio *cough*) being overlooked by everyone except the Globes, but life goes on. (Unfortunately not for the fanboys, who can never get over anything.) It's never perfect. More on this later in my reflections.
Winner: Sean Penn (Milk)- As I eluded to previously, the Best Actor race this year has constantly shifted between Sean and comeback story of the year Mickey Rourke. It was presumably a really close vote, but Sean probably won because of his performance being incredibly transformative and pertinent to today's political landscape. It should be noted that Sean lost two major precursors, the Golden Globe and BAFTA, to Mickey, but these were largely due to a general apathy towards Milk by the two organizations. However, these "commie, homo-loving sons of guns" got it right. Go Sean!!
•Picture- presented by Steven Spielberg
Winner: Slumdog Millionaire (Fox Searchlight)
SHOCKER. Yay for the cute little Indian kids! Fox Searchlight supposedly spent a lot of money and effort to get them all there, but they made it.
Note: I don't predict the other 16 awards b/c of my lack of awareness of them, and it would take way too long to summarize everything. :(

I deeply apologize for the length; that's definitely enough for today. I promise my reflections post tomorrow will be shorter(!) and the last cinema post for a while. We all need a break from this stuff.
More musings...

Anatomy of a Performance 08/09 -- Part 4

Asides/scattered thoughts:
Sorry these last two are shorter than the other 5. I've had a brain-frying week, particularly editing the next edition of the paper, and unfortunately, the next few weeks will be the same. Next week, tech rehearsals for our musical start, and I will also be away for two days, attending a student council conference at the state capitol (which will hopefully be worth getting up at 3 in the morning for.) As far as blogging is concerned, I've had quite a few ideas in mind that are not cinema-related, and I can utilize them now that awards season is finally coming to an end. (New readers: I assure you I have many other interests other than film!) But first, Hollywood's annual night of cinematic mercy is coming in about 48 hours, and I, like every year, will be tuning in. I may or may not live-blog, depending on if I have time, but I will try to post my quick thoughts following the ceremony. In the meantime, have an nice weekend and thanks for reading!
Now to tonight's main event: I conclude this year's Anatomy of a Performance series with a masterful Marvel and the living Legend. Drum roll please...

Sean Penn (Milk) - Harvey Milk
The astonishing Sean Penn produces his most impressive work in Gus Van Sant's Milk. But before I divulge about the performance, I must stress (and praise!) that the film and his performance manage to avoid all possible clichés of biopics. Milk provides an intimate portrait of a man who changed his environment by "never blending in." It doesn't try to preach any political message or endearing legacy; instead, it lets the audience discover its true meaning themselves. It pulls you straight into the era and the action, and while educating you about the historical perspective, it transforms into a deeply affecting eulogy for the man it epitomizes.
Even with the delightful supporting cast, all of whom I enjoyed, Penn constitutes the ultimate core of Milk. He brings in his own flavor to his eccentric character, enhancing the overall persona. Like all genuinely great biopic performances, he captures every gesture of slain gay rights leader Harvey Milk without making it purely an imitation. There's so much to admire about the performance because Penn completely immerses himself in the character. The audience doesn't see the gears turning in his head; that's what makes it all the more effective. Penn as Milk is sometimes whimsical and playful, but ultimately, his portrayal is very moving and inspirational. It is a testament to the tremendous hope that the real Milk brought to so many people in the late 1970s, and hopefully, he would have been proud of it.
Currently locked in a tight battle with Mickey Rourke for this year's Best Actor trophy, I'm predicting he will take it, but Rourke winning definitely wouldn't surprise me. Having not seen The Wrestler, I can't properly judge, but I have heard many good things about the film, especially Rourke's performance.
One last note: I wasn't always the biggest Sean Penn fan, especially after watching his campy, overrated, Oscar-winning turn in Mystic River ("IS THAT MY DAUGHTA IN THERRRRE???"); consequently because of his inspired work in Milk, he has definitely grown on me, and I now see why he is one of the most celebrated actors of our era.

Two more marvels: the late, great Heath Ledger (The Dark Knight) - The Joker ("Why. So. Serious?"...'nuff said.); Kristin Scott Thomas (I've Loved You So Long/Il y a longtemps que je t'aime)- Juliette

Meryl Streep (Doubt) - Sister Aloysius Beauvier
While I don't think this is the best female performance of the year and certainly not as exceptional as some of Streep's other fabulous roles, as living legend #1, she hardly ever lets us down, and so I am obligated to discuss her turn as powerful Sister Aloysius. The more I ponder her performance, the more I think about how she could have made the character, a domineering and commanding nun, a total caricature. And yet, she brings many facets of humanity to this character.
On the surface, Aloysius is monstrously determined to engineer the downfall of her rival priest, Father Flynn. She has no evidence that Father Flynn committed any wrongdoing, but with her position of leadership, as well as her personal tensions with the priest, she is determined to find the proof. She makes her certainties lucid from the very beginning and immediately establishes her stance. This sets the plot in motion, and each heated exchange and testy confrontation builds up climactically. But slowly but surely, we realize that internally, her stiff and seemingly relentless facade is cracking. Her last scene, which I won't give away, is especially impacting and rather surprising.
Streep has excellent line delivery, among the many signatures of her renowned career. In each scene, the rapid-fire dialogue is precisely placed and executed. She has quite a few interesting one-liners that are always worth pondering. But bringing it back to the facets of humanity, I feel she properly managed the character when it could have become too over-the-top or even contrived, showing her meticulous skills.
Ever since her SAG win last month, many Oscar pundits have been speculating that she could pull an upset in Oscar's Best Actress race. After all, she is supremely respected in the pantheon of cinema, and the longevity of her career is astonishing. Now with 15 nominations, she has not won in over a quarter century. I think this is Winslet's Oscar to lose, but Streep could potentially surprise us.

Other noteworthy legends: none that compare to the Meryl Streep, of course. :)

And, that's a wrap! Thanks for reading this year's series. I hope you enjoyed my analyses of these varied but outstanding performances. Please understand that there were many more I wanted to write about as well, particularly the ones I mentioned as runners-up. All are highly recommended, so I strongly urge you check them out! Until next year...
More musings...

Anatomy of a Performance 08/09 -- Part 3

I've decided to, rather than cram the last three categories into one post like I originally intended to, split them into pairs like the previous posts in the series. And in Part 3, we honor a literal pair, a dynamic Duo. I had many to choose from this year, including a struggling drug addict mending ties with her family + sensible, practical sister and complete foil = brilliance from two very talented women (Rachel Getting Married) and a charismatic, driven interviewer vs. embattled, driven ex-president (Frost/Nixon), but in the end, I went with a duo that I hope you'll forgive me for dwelling too much on.

Leonardo DiCaprio & Kate Winslet (Revolutionary Road) - Frank & April Wheeler
Definitively, a duo performance is created when an individual performance cannot exist without the other and where two exceptional parts form one extraordinary whole. While watching Revolutionary Road, there's no question that the two lead roles turn into a double feature of sorts. One important advantage the DiCaprio-Winslet team behind the roles have is that they are close friends in real life. Understanding the nature of the film, it seems like without that kind of bond, the no holds barred feel to their respective performances would have been impossible. They have absolutely no limits and have pushed each other to places we have never seen them reach before as actors. Utterly engaging on every level, they pull you into every crevice of every scene. The intense characters are clearly not very likable in the beginning, but throughout the film, you gradually begin to comprehend all of their problems and motives, and both actors have the inimitable skill of making you care about their characters, no matter what stands in their way.
While there are many instances of immensely jarring verbal fireworks, much of Revolutionary Road is not about what is said, but rather what isn't said. The moments of silence are just as significant as the explosive fights featured in the film's second act. In these crucial scenes, both put to work their impressive abilities to effortlessly display their facial expressions and convey so much emotion in just their eyes. But the single most essential part of this duo is that in every scene, what one actor gives, the other is able to duplicate in a split second. It's almost like a broken record, except far more interesting. The common thread that holds it all together is that every single nuance is realized, and nothing is held back.
I was hoping the always amazing Winslet would win her richly deserved Oscar for this performance, but in about a week, she will be recognized for her other 08 film, The Reader. I haven't gotten a chance to see it yet, but many who have claim "she's going to win for the wrong role." :( In trying to be more optimistic, I think we should consider it as a reward for both roles. Seriously, she's actually going to win this year: that's enough for me! As for the also always amazing DiCaprio, I'm similarly trying to be more optimistic about his "awardage", or lack thereof. His time will come someday, and when he does win, it will be in recognition of the decade and a half (and counting) of incredible work he has given us. (Which also applies to Winslet this year.) In the meantime, I wonder what's in store for collaboration #3...something lighter, perhaps?

Other duos that just missed the cut (read: I really wanted to write about them b/c they were oh-so great): Anne Hathaway & Rosemarie DeWitt (Rachel Getting Married) - Kym & Rachel; Michael Sheen & Frank Langella (Frost/Nixon) - David Frost & Richard Nixon
The final installment in the series will be coming later this week, so stay tuned!
More musings...

Anatomy of a Performance 08/09 -- Part 2

The second part of the series highlights a Hollywood newcomer and a veteran thespian finally getting some limelight. It's the Breakthrough and Breakout.

Sally Hawkins (Happy-Go-Lucky) - Poppy
Up-and-coming Brit Sally Hawkins has had a banner year as the star of Mike Leigh's exuberant comedy, winning Best Actress at the 2008 Berlinale, various Critics' Associations, including the prestigious New York and Los Angeles Critics' prizes, and of course, she picked up the Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Musical or Comedy last month. Previously, Hawkins starred in Masterpiece Theatre's Persuasion and appeared in small parts in other Leigh films.
I never got around to posting my review of this flick when I saw it back in November, so long story short: the witty screenplay and memorable supporting players are brilliant, but Hawkins' performance is the heart and soul of this all-around uplifting experience. Hawkins plays Poppy, a thirty-something London primary school teacher always yearning for the best in life, even through difficult times. She deals with hardships with such bubbly optimism that it's hard not to bring a smile to your face. :) Along the way, Poppy discovers the eccentricities of life and has to find a way to deal these. She is determined not to let go of her optimism, even in dealing with her angry driving instructor (polar opposite personality!), and helping out her family and friends with conflicts.
It seems like a straight-forward character, but it requires a complex balance of simplicity and grace. Hawkins brings a sense of buoyant substance, beautifully highlighting every aspect of the character. She takes everything in stride without seeming cheesy or overwhelming like the role often entails.
Overall, Hawkins is vivacious and spectacular in this splendid role. It's a shame that despite her many accolades, the Academy overlooked easily the best comedic performance of the year. After this introduction to her, I'm highly anticipating more exceptional work to come!

Richard Je
nkins (The Visitor) - Walter Vale
From a career that has spanned three decades, Richard Jenkins has played in bit parts in countless films, some of which are fairly well known. He often plays the character whose name you can never remember, but not anymore. At 61, Richard Jenkins has finally broke out of that shell that's kept him enclosed for so long. In the little-seen indie The Visitor, he takes on his first truly leading role and is finally receiving recognition for his largely unnoticed work, as well as bringing audiences to discover this fine film. (Shameless plug: I feel The Visitor is one of the year's most underrated films for its poignant look at cultural awareness in the post 9/11 world. Please check it out!)
Jenkins' character Walter Vale is a lonely college professor in small town Connecticut struggling to find liveliness in his existence. His wife has passed away, his classes and students have become humdrum and tedious, and he has lost the motivation for a fresh perspective in life. But then, he discovers two immigrants living in his New York City apartment. At first, he is wary of interacting with them, but they gradually introduce him to vibrant African and Middle Eastern music and culture. There are some drastic complications introduced in the middle of the film that change the plot, but they bring Walter even more new opportunities and unexpected friendships. Over time, he realizes how he needs to truly live his life and actively seek new beginnings.
Jenkins approaches this subtle role with meticulous ease. Every restrained expression seems effortless; every mannerism is perfectly realized. He flawlessly carries the film and the subdued nature of his character. Aside from one scene at the end, he doesn't have any flashy lines or spirited rants, which makes his performance all the more remarkable.
I am super excited that he received an Oscar nomination, which was largely due to the respect he has gained in the industry as the quintessential "actor's actor", and the nomination is a great reward for his tireless commitment to the craft.

Additional breakthroughs/breakouts worth noting: Rebecca Hall (Vicky Cristina Barcelona) - Vicky; Taraji P. Henson (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button) - Queenie

More musings...

Anatomy of a Performance 08/09 -- Part 1

Wow, this is sad. I'm discussing movies while everyone else in America seems to be fixated on the Super Bowl. Don't despair, football nation; I will be watching the big game too.
As Hollywood's annual night of cinematic mercy approaches, I'm kicking off the month with the first in a personal series of profiles of my favorite standout performances of the year. A brief history of the Anatomy of a Performance series: I have been a "cinephile" for nearly my entire life, and every year I get to see more and more movies. So a few years ago, I felt compelled to pick a few memorable performances and write about what makes them exceptional and why I love them. I've continued doing this each year, selecting from 3 to 5 to an unprecedented 8 this year. Why performances, you ask? Well, I guess at the time, they were the main aspects I paid attention to, but I've learned to examine other things as well. I tend to stick to the acting, writing, and directing, since they usually appear at the forefront of movies I watch.
Now that I've been blogging again, I guess I have a nice audience to share these with. Some of my selections are frontrunners in the Oscar race; others weren't even nominated. Regardless of this, they created an incredible impact on screen, even if they received divisive reception from audiences and critics. Each entry is a dissection of the performance so to speak, exemplifying why it distinguishes itself from the pack. Photo-wise, I decided to change it up a bit and use portraits instead of movie stills. You guys might be tired of seeing the stills b/c they're being used everywhere for advertising and such. ;) First up, two Scene Stealers after the jump.

To me, a scene stealer is not just any supporting player, but a seemingly minor character who ultimately matters a great deal. They take attention off of the leads, and in that moment, they fully engage the audience to understand their plight and pay attention to nothing else. The following two actors epitomize scene-stealing to its zenith. If you get to see these films, I'm sure you will agree.

Viola Davis (Doubt) - Mrs. Miller
"Someone give her a movie!" shouted Meryl Streep in her SAG acceptance speech. She was referring to her co-star Viola Davis, and that's exactly what this stage veteran deserves after her remarkable turn in Doubt. Julliard graduate, Tony winner, and now Oscar nominee: she has racked up many noteworthy achievements throughout her career. Previously, she had some small parts in movies such as Far from Heaven and Nights in Rodanthe, but Doubt marks her entrance into the spotlight. And now, we are finally introduced to her gifted work.
Viola (I love that name) has only one scene in the film, but she nails every second in that sole scene. The set-up is this: Sister Aloysius (Meryl Streep) suspects that Father Flynn (Philip Seymour Hoffman) has abused Donald, the only Black student at St. Nicholas Catholic School, so she sets up a meeting with Mrs. Miller, the student's mother, played by Davis, to discuss her suspicions, which she believes to be certain. What follows is a gripping monologue of defense from Mrs. Miller, firmly stating why she does not want to take part in the feud. She tells Aloysius about Donald's tough upbringing and why, despite the risks and the cost, she sent him to the school. She explains that Donald needs guidance from a man like Father Flynn and does not want to see her son falter simply because of his surroundings.
Davis paints a haunting portrait of a working mother determined to give her son the best she can provide for him, going toe-to-toe against another strong-willed character. Her character leads to a turning point in the film, where the audience is no longer buying Sister Aloysius' argument. Like I said in my Doubt review, Davis is truly sensational because in one scene, she impacts audiences with solid conviction in ways that many actors cannot even dream of doing in an entire film. And that, my friends, is the mark of a true scene stealer. Bravo!

Michael Shannon (Revolutionary Road) - John Givings
At 6ft. 4in., Michael Shannon probably looms over most people, and so it's not surprising how much he dominates the two scenes he is featured in. Like our first scene stealer, 2008 was a groundbreaking year for Shannon. He has toiled in bit parts, as well as doing much unnoticed stage work. In fact, when he auditioned for Revolutionary Road, director Sam Mendes realized he had already seen some of Shannon's theatre roles. Now, he has received a well-deserved Oscar nomination for his scene-stealing.
His character in the film, John Givings, is the deranged son of Helen Givings (Kathy Bates), the perky neighborhood real estate agent. Originally a genius mathematician, his abilities have been confined due to his presumed insanity. We are introduced to him when he visits the Wheelers (Leonardo DiCaprio & Kate Winslet) with his parents, on a break from the mental asylum he resides in.
Shannon is chilling and frighteningly truthful as John. His role reminds me a lot of the equally disturbing Heath Ledger as the Joker in The Dark Knight. They share the same mocking laugh and sardonic remarks, as well as similar purposes in their respective films (both provide some surprising honesty despite the chaos they are surrounded by). Shannon's presence is so controlled, even amid the fury of his second scene, which I unfortunately cannot give away in order not to spoil it. He is electrifying yet subtle, as he pokes some big holes in the seemingly picture-perfect marriage of the Wheelers. He dramatizes the "hopeless emptiness" of suburbia, making both the Wheelers and the audience question their existence. This leads to the engrossing penultimate act of the film. As bizarre as it sounds, Shannon also brings a spice of SNL's Bill Hader into the fray. I think it is his over-bearing facial expressions that manage to convey so many feelings at once that reminded me of Hader. Also, his dominance at the most unexpected times resembles that of Hader. Anyway, Michael Shannon's calm but terrifying turn glorifies the art of scene-stealing, and I hope we get to see more of his work in the future.

Additional scene-stealers worth noting: Penélope Cruz (Vicky Cristina Barcelona) - Maria Elena; Eddie Marsan (Happy-Go-Lucky) - Scott
More musings...

Reel Brief: Scattered Thoughts

So a lot has occurred since I last blogged about awards season, specifically the Oscar nominations and last night's SAGs. After a extremely stressful two days (Thursday & Friday) at an Honors Band festival, I'm terribly exhausted. I was going to bitch about the Oscar nominations and my pent-up frustration (AMPAS always finds ways to piss me off every single year), but that would bore all of us. It's also a little late for that. SAGs were interesting, but there weren't too many surprises. As always, Meryl Streep's speech totally brought the house down, and although I don't think she deserved it, I never get upset when she wins. Therefore, if Meryl wins the Oscar (which she might, you never know), I'll be happy just to hear another one of her excellent speeches. Sean Penn also won and looked genuinely classy about it. He tends to give some pretty pretentious speeches (i.e. when he won his first Oscar five years ago), but I have to hand it to him this time. Plus, he truly deserves all the accolades for Milk, easily one of my favorite performances and movies of the year. OK, enough about awards. A movie review (Revolutionary Road) after the jump.

Revolutionary Road ~ A-
As Revolutionary Road's credits rolled, I was shaking as I got out of my seat. I can't recall the last time that has happened to me, and it conveys perfectly how I felt about the film. Yes, it's an unpleasant film, unlike a lot of the Oscar favorites this year, and it's heavy material to digest, but if people could look past that, I think they would realize that it is an exceptional piece of work: hard-hitting, truthful, jarring, affecting, everything I expected it to be and more. Who cares if it's depressing, bleak, and dismal? DEAL WITH IT. The first act starts out a little shaky and slow, but for me, that's how the novel was. By contrast, the second act is absolutely exhilarating to watch. You can measure the impact of each event leading to the next, until everything falls apart in the tumultuous conclusion.
The cinematography, art direction, and costume design were lovely and really highlighted the period; Thomas Newman's score, while somewhat redundant, was hauntingly beautiful. The editing was slightly shabby; I felt it could have been more meticulous. As anyone who has read the novel knows, there are a lot of layers to construct and convey. I did not expect the film to meet the depth of the novel, and I was right. However, the screenplay was still a faithful adaptation and excellent effort from rookie screenwriter Justin Haythe. It must have been extremely difficult to adapt this novel, and he gets major props for trying and succeeding quite well. Perhaps, we could have seen more flashbacks to understand the backstory of the characters, but in the grand scheme of things, that's a minute problem. A lot of the dialogue could have been melodramatic or forced, but that was not a problem. Sam Mendes' direction shows his desire for perfection and the importance of seemingly small ideas. Like American Beauty, he shows his gift of bringing out the best in actors, which brings me to the performances... (putting all personal judgment aside)
Good lord, they were earth-shatteringly amazing, truly an actor's movie. DiCaprio was perfect, absolutely flawless. He details every nuance, every single shade of gray about Frank Wheeler. He never stumbles, never overplays or understates. This is hands-down his best performance. Winslet, because of the nature of the roles, has less to work with starting out, but she does not let this affect her performance. She is simply astounding at managing her maniacal character, connecting with the audience when it seems utterly impossible. Of course, their chemistry together is phenomenal, and I feel each makes significant contributions to the other's role. Michael Shannon is also brilliant. He brings so much truth and honesty to his chilling turn, and although his insanity could have been too histrionic, he plays everything with proper balance. I think that applies to all three actors: the roles are very dramatic, but nothing they do is contrived in any way. Everything felt unbelievably natural, both the moments of fireworks and those of silence.
Aside from a few flaws, some of which were inevitable, I was absolutely blown away by how much I loved this flick. I was shocked that it met and probably exceeded my sky-high expectations, and it is an atrocity that it was overlooked this awards season. Revolutionary Road is so damn good. WOW is all I can say.
More musings...